Cricket Data Intelligence

IPL Analytics
Dashboard

1,218Total Matches
2,89,673Balls Analysed
19Seasons of Data
Toss Winner Win Rate
50.5%
Barely above a coin flip
Middle-Over Run Gap
+7.0
Largest gap: winners vs losers (overs 7–15)
All-Time Top Scorer
V Kohli
9,050 runs · SR 130.4
Q1 Do teams that win the toss actually win more matches?

Comparing win rates across toss outcome and toss decision (field vs bat)

Toss winner vs toss loser — match win rate

Based on 1,218 completed matches · dashed line = 50% random chance

Win rate by toss decision — field first vs bat first

Field first (n=803) vs Bat first (n=415) · dashed = 50%
Q2 Which phase — Powerplay, Middle, or Death — is most linked to winning?

Average runs per innings scored by winning teams vs losing teams in each phase

Average runs per phase — winning teams vs losing teams

Δ = run gap between winning and losing teams per phase
Q3 Top 5 batters and top 5 bowlers across all seasons

Ranked by total runs (batters) and total wickets (bowlers) · includes strike rate and economy

Top 5 batters — all-time runs

#BatterRunsBallsStrike RateProgress

Top 5 bowlers — all-time wickets

#BowlerWicketsOversEconomyProgress
Trend Season-wise total runs — how IPL scoring has evolved

Total runs across all matches per season (numeric seasons only)

Total runs by season

Split-season labels (e.g. 2020/21) excluded · hover for values
Venue Venue-wise toss advantage — where does the toss matter?

Win rate of toss winner per ground · minimum 10 matches · green = toss helps, red = toss hurts

Toss winner win rate by venue (min. 10 matches)

Dashed line = 50% baseline (random chance)
💡
Surprise finding: Winning the toss gives almost no statistical edge — toss winners win just 50.5% of matches, barely a coin flip. Yet the data reveals that the Middle overs (7–15) show the largest run gap between winning and losing teams (+7.0 runs), bigger than the Powerplay (+5.1) and Death overs (+3.1) that fans obsess over. The match is decided in the overs nobody talks about.